Congratulations to NPIX!! aggregate traffic has now crossed 1Gbps. I believe traffic will continue growing rapidly.
This entry was posted on February 28, 2012, 6:39 am and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
I think now those ISP who are not providing local NPIX bandwidth to customer should be unplugged from NPIX.
and policy for minimum NPIX bandwidth to all Internet user’s should be made to monitor all ISP.
ISP running in WIFI i.e Broadlink is giving 2-3 Mbps NPIX traffic per customer but ISP running in Fiber, Cables (Worldlink) are capping NPIX Bandwidth to 512kbps and most of the time it is not working ….
I think now those ISP who are not providing local NPIX bandwidth to customer should be unplugged from NPIX.
and policy for minimum NPIX bandwidth to all Internet user’s should be made to monitor all ISP.
ISP running in WIFI i.e Broadlink is giving 2-3 Mbps NPIX traffic per customer but ISP running in Fiber, Cables (Worldlink) are capping NPIX Bandwidth to 512kbps and most of the time it is not working ….
NPIX admins, Need to think for it hai …..
The wonderful thing is we have a market economy and if a user is not satisfied by an ISP’s services, he/she can always buy services from bunch of other ISPs. It is up to the consumer to decide who he/she wants to buy from. No one should be forcing anybody.
What I really like to see is every user getting a few Mbps bandwidth (or more) at their home for a minimal fee.
Ashok Gautam :
I think now those ISP who are not providing local NPIX bandwidth to customer should be unplugged from NPIX.
and policy for minimum NPIX bandwidth to all Internet user’s should be made to monitor all ISP.
ISP running in WIFI i.e Broadlink is giving 2-3 Mbps NPIX traffic per customer but ISP running in Fiber, Cables (Worldlink) are capping NPIX Bandwidth to 512kbps and most of the time it is not working ….
NPIX admins, Need to think for it hai …..
The wonderful thing is we have a market economy and if a user is not satisfied by an ISP’s services, he/she can always buy services from bunch of other ISPs. It is up to the consumer to decide who he/she wants to buy from. No one should be forcing anybody.
What I really like to see is every user getting a few Mbps bandwidth (or more) at their home for a minimal fee.
How would Nepalese internet users know their ISP is not with NPIX complaint… not all users are tech enthusiasts and many don’t care either. So maybe NPIX should release some info. on public interest.
How would Nepalese internet users know their ISP is not with NPIX complaint… not all users are tech enthusiasts and many don’t care either. So maybe NPIX should release some info. on public interest.
We measure traffic on the Ethernet switches we operate and real-time aggregate traffic graphs are available.
However, we do not collect information on individual member ISP’s bandwidth policy, which is entirely up to the ISP.
Why is this that after so much consumption of Npix local bandwidth unser increasing day by day i see 1GB traffic cannot be raised .. is this the only capacity of local bandwidth that can bo hold huh….
I think Mr. Ekendra’s question is not answered properly.
Why only aggregated graph?
I think, people should know how much local content delivered through each service provider facilitating local traffic exchange. So that end user can at least guess which service provider is the best contributor of local traffic observing graph.
I think Mr. Ekendra’s question is not answered properly.
Why only aggregated graph?
I think, people should know how much local content delivered through each service provider facilitating local traffic exchange. So that end user can at least guess which service provider is the best contributor of local traffic observing graph.
Only aggregated graphs are available to public. As a standard practice, we do not publish details of individual port publicly.
I think ISP are not interested to use NPIX traffic anymore … the NPIX traffic is decreased (250 Mbps) as compared to few months ago (1 Gbps), traffic decreased by 75% which should be increasing by min. 50%
#1 by Indiver on February 28, 2012 - 6:44 am
Congratulations to all members! Now that we have reached the landmark 1Gbps mark, look forward to 1.5Gbps in the next couple of months.
#2 by Bibek on March 6, 2012 - 12:27 pm
Any interesting reasons behind this growth? Are there any particular factors for the increase in Exchange traffic?
#3 by Ashok Gautam on March 9, 2012 - 9:07 am
I think now those ISP who are not providing local NPIX bandwidth to customer should be unplugged from NPIX.
and policy for minimum NPIX bandwidth to all Internet user’s should be made to monitor all ISP.
ISP running in WIFI i.e Broadlink is giving 2-3 Mbps NPIX traffic per customer but ISP running in Fiber, Cables (Worldlink) are capping NPIX Bandwidth to 512kbps and most of the time it is not working ….
NPIX admins, Need to think for it hai …..
#4 by Indiver on March 14, 2012 - 6:48 am
Increase in the amount of local content.
#5 by Indiver on March 14, 2012 - 6:49 am
This is due to the increase in amount of local content.
#6 by Indiver on March 14, 2012 - 7:01 am
The wonderful thing is we have a market economy and if a user is not satisfied by an ISP’s services, he/she can always buy services from bunch of other ISPs. It is up to the consumer to decide who he/she wants to buy from. No one should be forcing anybody.
What I really like to see is every user getting a few Mbps bandwidth (or more) at their home for a minimal fee.
#7 by Ekendra on March 24, 2012 - 3:54 am
How would Nepalese internet users know their ISP is not with NPIX complaint… not all users are tech enthusiasts and many don’t care either. So maybe NPIX should release some info. on public interest.
#8 by Indiver on March 28, 2012 - 5:08 pm
We measure traffic on the Ethernet switches we operate and real-time aggregate traffic graphs are available.
However, we do not collect information on individual member ISP’s bandwidth policy, which is entirely up to the ISP.
#9 by Saurav on March 31, 2012 - 3:51 am
I think this boost in internal traffic is mainly being driven by the content being delivered from Google cache servers at NT.
#10 by Bajey on May 28, 2012 - 9:08 am
What does this mean for us?
#11 by manish on June 8, 2012 - 5:03 am
some of the sites has been disabled by indian supreme court and we,nepalese also cant access these sites, who is resposible for it??
#12 by Nimesh on June 22, 2012 - 12:17 am
Why is this that after so much consumption of Npix local bandwidth unser increasing day by day i see 1GB traffic cannot be raised .. is this the only capacity of local bandwidth that can bo hold huh….
#13 by Dipak on September 28, 2012 - 12:09 pm
I think Mr. Ekendra’s question is not answered properly.
Why only aggregated graph?
I think, people should know how much local content delivered through each service provider facilitating local traffic exchange. So that end user can at least guess which service provider is the best contributor of local traffic observing graph.
#14 by Indiver on September 29, 2012 - 12:33 pm
Only aggregated graphs are available to public. As a standard practice, we do not publish details of individual port publicly.
#15 by Ashok Gautam on May 11, 2013 - 4:48 am
I think ISP are not interested to use NPIX traffic anymore … the NPIX traffic is decreased (250 Mbps) as compared to few months ago (1 Gbps), traffic decreased by 75% which should be increasing by min. 50%